menu
robots A-Zrobot timelinegamestv & moviesfeaturescontactfacebooktwitteryoutubetumblrrss feed
bg logo logobump



• Short Circuit

Short Circuit is one of the most beloved robot-related movies of all time.  More than 20 years have passed since I had last seen it, so it was with cautious optimism that I selected it on Netflix.  I have fond memories of it, but I was just a kid then.  Now, I can see it falls into just about every pitfall of the comedies that characterized the ’80s.  It closely follows the sappy E.T. formula, where an innocent, otherworldly creature is hunted by the heartless military authorities.  So this is definitely a kid’s film… or is it?

It stars the contemptible Steve Gutternberg (who hasn’t starred in anything worthwhile since), as a carefree roboticist, and Ally Sheedy of The Breakfast Club gets caught in the middle as the animal-loving girl who can’t find a trustworthy man.  Notably, Fisher Stevens rounds out the cast as a racist “brown face” East Indian character with a thick accent.  He’s full of off-putting sexual innuendos, which kind of tars the film’s family-friendly image.  But there’s enough slapstick gags based on The Three Stooges that Short Circuit is clearly appealing to a younger audience.

The undeniable star of the show is Number 5, a prototype built by the NOVA company for the military.  It was designed by the legendary concept artist Syd Mead (who gave us the TRON lightcycles and Blade Runner‘s spinners, among others).  It’s a fantastic looking robot puppet, and was one of the most sophisticated movie props ever built.  It’s expressive eyes are enough to melt any robot junkie’s heart, even if it’s primary objective is to nuke the Soviets.  Hit by a jolt of lightning after an explosive demonstration of the robot squad’s firepower, Number 5 inexplicably becomes self-aware and shows incredible intelligence and curiosity.  It’s a far cry from the complex and semi-believable explanations made by smarter science fiction, but it’s just one of those things you have to go along with for the sake of the plot.

Of course, all hell breaks loose when Number 5 inadvertently escapes from NOVA’s lab.  It’s absolute nonsense with few if any laughs, but it’s still sort of fun to watch out of curiosity.  One can’t help but notice the similarity between Number 5 and certain real robots developed since then.  I’m sure I’ll probably make a lot of people angry by saying so, but Short Circuit hasn’t exactly aged well.  It’s one of the few examples of robots on film where the robot isn’t a villain, so at least it has that going for it.  It’s practically required viewing if you’re into robots, but unless you’re on a serious nostalgia kick you’re probably better off skipping it and watching WALL-E again instead.

Amazon USA Amazon Canada Amazon UK
  • http://twitter.com/PlasticPals Robotbling

    @IJ Dee-Vo

    I would compare my sentiment to the new Transformers. The special effects are cool, but they can’t save what is essentially a bad movie.

    @Daniel

    In the case of something like Gandhi, where Sir Ben Kingsley portrayed an East Indian, I think it is acceptable, because it was done respectfully. In Short Circuit, it isn’t respectful.

    Whenever an actor colors their skin and speaks with a thick accent for comedic effect for any race, I think it is racist on some level. I’m not advocating we destroy the movie or anything, but I do think it is wrong and worth pointing out.

    Oh, and I’m not an American, I’m Canadian. :)

  • Daniel

    I catch the movie every few years on TV and still like it. I also think it aged quite well. Some of the early CGI movies should be considered unwatchable nowadays compared to Short Circuit.

    I also can’t follow you on that racism claim. You Americans should really quit that “political correctness” brainwashing. You can only overcome racism if the origin of people is handled in a natural way, without voluntary “thought control”.

    Feel free to call my a Kraut, Jerry or Bratwurst any day…

  • http://www.ijdeevo.com IJ Dee-Vo

    Heartless? They had an armed robot on the loose that they couldn’t control an eventually couldn’t track. Also it was only much later that Number 5 learns that you can’t reassamble living things. I’d say they were acting quite responible. The only real villian was the ex boyfriend. On another note, the Number 5 mechanism makes me prefere the movie over Wall-E in a non “serious nostalgia kick” way